Annotated Bibliography in JAND Style

Annotated Bibliography in JAND Style

Jarmoluk, Michal. "Old Books Book Old Library Education Archive" 9/5/14 via pixabay. CC0 Public Domain License.

Fischer Kristen. "New Healthy School Lunch Rules Stir Controversy as Food Trash Piles Up." Healthlines RSS News.  http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2014/07/08/michelle-obama-s-federal-forced-food-efforts-stir-controversy/. Published November 26, 2014. Accessed September 5, 2015. 

The text is trying to inform the reader that that the health guidelines for healthier lunches at schools

has resulted in more waste because students do not find them appetizing. It is trying to promote a way

for everyone to see that kids do not find healthy food appetizing. The government strives to make

these foods more appetizing to students and to ease up on their strict laws on these meals.The source

seems to support the idea of children being involved in the healthy food selection process. The author

claims that children are more inclined to eat healthy food if they are part of the process of selecting

their healthy food options. Also, she tends to favor the change in a less strict lunch plan for the 

students because she only highlight the downsides of Obama's lunch meal plan; she emphasizes the

changes that could be made to better the system. In the future, I can use this to highlight Michelle Obama's action on the topic and the food waste.

Merrill, Hope. "Michelle Obama's Federal Forced Food Efforts Stir Controversy - Breitbart." Breitbart. http://www.healthline.com/health-news/new-healthy-school-lunches-stir-controversy-112614#1 Published July 8, 2015. Accessed September 5, 2015. 

The purpose of the text is trying to inform the reader about Michelle Obama's plan to reduce food
waste of the set healthier lunch standards for students. It also informs the reader that the 
federal government forces the schools to implement meal plans on students in order for the schools 
to make money. However, Michelle Obama wants to implement healthier requirements that do not 
force the students to take food that they do not necessarily want. The article is promoting the idea 
that students throw away over $100,000 worth of food each year, and that this money can be 
spent elsewhere to improve the schools' lunch systems. This money thrown away is hurting the 
schools, and families are losing their money. Therefore, this article is supposed to stir up some 
angst against the current system and to influence people to approve Michelle Obama's new lunch 
meal plan. However, it illustrates Americans' unwillingness to change to healthier food options 
as well because many students refuse to eat the healthier food options given to them, so they are 
blaming Obama for creating the strict standards that were enforced prior.

Muller, Katrin, Lars Libuda, Katharina Diethelm, Inge Huybrechts, Luis A. Moreno, Yannis Manios, Lorenza Mistura, Jean Dallongeville, Anthony Kafatos, Marcela Gonzalez-Gross, Madalena Cuenca-Garcia, Michael Sjostrom, Lena Hallstrom, Kurt Widhalm, and Mathilde Kersting. "Lunch at School, at Home or Elsewhere. Where Do Adolescents Usually Get It and What Do They Eat? Results of the HELENA Study." Lunch at School, at Home or Elsewhere. Where Do Adolescents Usually Get It and What Do They Eat? Results of the HELENA Study 71 (2013): 332-39. Web Science. http://www.sciencedirect.com.ezproxy1.library.arizona.edu/science/article/pii/S019566631300384X. Accessed September 5, 2015.

Its purpose is to contribute to the ongoing debate about adolescent nutrition. It claims that children at home eat more potatoes and vegetables. However, in schools, they eat minimal potatoes and high amounts of sweet, sugary foods. The intended audience is anyone who seeks information in the topic of nutrition and adolescent food consumption. It is assumed that the audience is unaware of school systems' policies because they are from a variety of different countries. In the future, I will use this article to highlight the differences in nutrition at home and at school that children exhibit.

Terry-McElrath, Yvonne M., Patrick M. O'Malley, and Lloyd D. Johnston. "Foods and 

Beverages Offered in US Public Secondary Schools through the National School Lunch 

Program from 2011–2013: Early Evidence of Improved Nutrition and Reduced 

Disparities." Foods and Beverages Offered in US Public Secondary Schools through the 

National School Lunch Program from 2011–2013: Early Evidence of Improved 

Nutrition and Reduced Disparities 78 (n.d.): 52-58. Rpt. in Preventive Medicine. Vol. 78. 

 52-58. Web Science.
http://www.sciencedirect.com.ezproxy1.library.arizona.edu/science/article/pii/S0091743515002261. Accessed Sept 5, 2015. 
Its purpose is to inform people about the trends in beverages and foods that middle school 
and high school students consume. The intended audience is anyone that has interest in the 
topic of nutrition involving healthier eating among students. In the future, I plan to use this 
article in order to see the early signs of improvement in child school nutrition.

Telford, Shawn. Plate Waste Happens with Lunches Brought from Home and Bought at School. Let's Improve It: https://storify.com/stavroulaa/school-lunch-nutrition-controversy/elements/9a73c0694a0c8ba0997ee446. Published August 26, 2015. Accessed September 5, 2015. 

The USDA Food and Nutrition Service is working tend hunger and improve nutrition in America. They are a government organization. The purpose it to show how the lunches brought from home and bought at school go to waste. It compares them in hopes of helping parents eliminate all of the waste. In the future, I will use this to find preventative methods to fix children wasting foods.

USDA. "A4: USDA Analysis Suggests That Last Year, Schools Saw a Net Nationwide Revenue Increase from School Lunches of Approximately $450M #FoodFri." Twitter. https://storify.com/stavroulaa/school-lunch-nutrition-controversy/elements/c3346257cbd1ec59796e6088. Published September 4, 2015. Accessed Sept 5, 2015.

Its purpose is to show the increase of revenue from school lunches. Prior to this, many schools were losing money because children would throw away food as waste. This could indicate that there is also less food waste. In the future, I will use this to further my studies in the amount of waste that children have produced with their school lunches and compare it to their bettered nutritional habits.

Tavernise, Sabrina. "School Lunches Becoming Healthier, Statistics Indicate." The New York Times. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/28/health/school-lunches-becoming-healthier-statistics-indicate.html. Published August 27, 2015. Accessed September 10, 2015.
Its purpose is to show the increase in children eating healthier. Due to a decrease in childhood obesity, the schools are recognized for this healthier change in children's diet because they have added more vegetable options to school lunches. In the future, I will use this to further my studies in developing the school lunch controversy. I can do this by comparing earlier finds about children wasting the healthy food options to how they now consume the healthier food. I would like to look more into this. I could possibly find another source that will highlight why children are now consuming the healthier options and not going to waste like before.

Klein, Rebecca. "Healthy School Lunches Might Not Actually Gross Students Out, Say Surveys." The Huffington Post. TheHuffingtonPost.com. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/25/students-healthy-school-lunches_n_5620905.html. Published July 25, 2014. Accessed September 11, 2015.
Its purpose is to inform the reader that school so-called "gross" school lunches appeal to children due to an increase in low-income families purchasing school lunches. Also, a recent poll that was conducted suggested that 56% of respondents agreed that children complained about the new lunches at first. However, 64% agreed that less students complain now. In the future, I will use this information to credit the school nutrition program and its small success. Students are still throwing away a significant amount of the vegetables offered. 

Kelly, Julie, and Jeff Stier. "Michelle Obama's 'Healthy' School Lunches." National Review Online. http://www.nationalreview.com/article/423784/uncle-sam-and-school-lunches. September 9, 2015. Accessed September 11, 2015. 
Its purpose is to illustrate the ongoing controversy of healthier school lunches. Despite children purchases more lunches, the food waste, food complaints, and loss of money still continues. School nutritionists are revolting because they think students should be monitored less with salts and grains due to the amassed amounts of waste. The only thing that has changed over the years is the increased price of welfare. If this plan is to be reinforced, the food that children eat will be in the hands of the government and not the parents. In the future, I can use this article to illustrate the ongoing struggle of the healthy school lunches. In addition, I can use the information provided to shock my reader about the government having greater power over children's nutrition.

Matus, Victorino. "'A Concerned 8-Year-Old Citizen' Writes Brutal Letter to Michelle Obama." 'A Concerned 8-Year-Old Citizen' Writes Brutal Letter to Michelle Obama. The Weekly Standard. http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/concerned-8-year-old-citizen-writes-brutal-letter-michelle-obama_926233.html#.VfJ1I-XdNww.gmail21. Published April 21, 2015. Accessed September 11, 2015. 
Its purpose is to create sympathy for the targets of Obama's healthy lunch plans. The method used is a letter that a children wrote addressing Obama and the lack of focus on more important issues. It appeals to the reader because a young child is cricising Obama for focusing on reducing ketchup in schools, whereas, he should be focused on more important issues, such as, issues in the Middle East. In the future, I will use this information in order to further my claims about children being displeased with school lunches.

Reflection

Olivia Wann's annotated bibliography was in JAND style which is the same as mine. She had helped me earlier locate the proper style, so I eagerly awaited to read hers! I noticed that she did not link the URLs, which I thought that the guide had specified to do. I realized that our style is very easy for the reader to follow; our style includes links that direct the reader directly to the sources. It also provides the sources in the same order that they appeared in the writing and is not alphabetical. I think this is easier for the reader because the reader does not have to scroll down the page and search for the specific source.

Lia Ossanna's annotated bibliography was in CSE style. Her style was not the same as mine. However, there were many similarities. The one that stood out to me the most was that there were direct links to the sources as well. I think this really helps the reader to locate the exact source if the information is not clear enough. Her style is basically the same as mine except for how she is supposed to cite the date published and accessed. The different styles strike me as useful for each profession. I assume that hers will benefit the best with hers, and I will benefit the best with mine.